phlygirl Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 Hi Everyone, Kanata Metis Cultural Enterprises Ltd. has applied to amend the City of Edmonton's Municipal Development Plan (MDP) and change zoning to allow gravel mining in the river valley, specifically in the Big Island/Woodbend Natural Area; from what I understand, this is Edmonton's largest remaining natural area. Please take a moment to visit the link below - the North Saskatchewan River Valley Conservation Society has posted information on the issue, along with contact information for Edmonton City Council. In addition, there is a City of Edmonton Public Hearing on May 16th. North Saskatchewan River Valley Conservation Society Thanks for your time, Aaron Quote
phlygirl Posted May 17, 2011 Author Posted May 17, 2011 Some articles from the Edmonton Journal and the Edmonton River Valley Conservation Society's response... Gravel mine developer sees benefits for Métis (Edmonton Journal May 16) Gravel plan draws stone-cold response from opponents (Edmonton Journal May 17) Edmonton River Valley Conservation Society's Response Quote
DennisS Posted May 18, 2011 Posted May 18, 2011 Good work I heard this morning that this proposal got turned down Great. By the sounds of it it was very close only 1 vote difference. We must perserve our River Valley. Again Great Dennis S. Quote
Junior Posted May 18, 2011 Posted May 18, 2011 That vote really surprised me. City council publicly stated that the proposal could only be considered if it were deemed essential. I just don't see how anyone could look at the facts and justify calling that project essential. Guess I shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth, eh? I was kind of hoping that this issue might raise the profile of the NSR, and get a few more guys from the club to fish it. Any one who's interested, let me know. There's a couple other guys from the club that fish the NSR, and I can't speak for them, but contact me and I'll tell you everything I know. Should only take about two minutes. Quote
dave robinson Posted May 18, 2011 Posted May 18, 2011 One should take close note of who voted in favor of the gravel pit. The economics from the City's perspective simply didn't make sense. But then one has to remember the general rule that municipal governments always favor development over citizens concerns. Developers get access and the ability to regularly lobby adminsitration and the councillors And most councillors see development as an increase in the tax base, which trumps environmental concerns almost every time Fortunately we have at least 7 who might think otherwise from time to time Kudos to them! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.